.

Thomas Kinkade Estate Appeals Decision to Open Probate Matters

An attorney for the girlfriend of the deceased painter calls the latest Kinkade estate proceedings 'frivolous.'

 

Attorneys representing the Thomas Kinkade estate have appealed a

A three-justice Sixth District Court of Appeal panel will now hear the controversial matter, considering briefs filed in the coming weeks, and will most likely schedule a hearing with a decision forthcoming sometime in the future, attorneys said. 

The appeal, filed July 24, is in response to Judge Thomas W. Cain's ruling denying Windermere Holdings, LLC's attorneys ex-parte application to compel binding arbitration, or closed-door proceedings, on the dispute related to two alleged wills Kinkade is said to have left live-in-girlfriend Amy Pinto-Walsh, granting her his Monte Sereno home, adjacent studio, $10 million, and his artwork estimated at more than $66 million.

"Judge Cain issued a different ruling than Judge [Leslie C.] Nichols, deciding that he would hear the alleged holographs at issue. I respect both those judges very much, but because of the different rulings and because of the different legal issues, the estate decided to file this appeal of Judge Cain's order," said Kinkade estate attorney Daniel L. Casas.

The Kinkade attorney was referring to a June 15 ruling by Judge Nichols that allowed a binding arbitration panel to privately hear Pinto-Walsh's claims that the estate violated a .

Kinkade, one of the most prolific and successful American painters of modern art, died the morning of April 6 His death set off a legal battle between his estate and Pinto-Walsh.

"Essentially the estate is trying to do the same thing that it did initially and that is to honor an agreement that was entered by Thomas Kinkade and Amy Pinto-Walsh to have these issues heard in binding arbitration," Casas said. 

A confidentiality agreement that the estate claims Pinto-Walsh signed in July of 2011 is at the heart of the legal issues, Casas said, adding that the document is broad when trying to explain Judge Cain's ruling.

Cain ruled that because the agreement didn't specifically state a testamentary disposition to a probate dispute needed to be conducted in binding arbitration, or behind closed doors, an open court could hear the issues.

Pinto-Walsh's attorney, Douglas Dal Cielo, called the appeal frivolous and was simply meant to delay the proceedings. A normal appeal can take a year to 18 months, but Dal Cielo said he believes the appeal could be subject to a motion to dismiss that they're considering filing with the court.

"If successful it will get rid of the appeal in short order," Dal Cielo said.

Soon after the painter died, his

The fate of the Monte Sereno Mansion, 16324 Ridgecrest Ave., is still unknown as Pinto-Walsh still resides there. Her attorneys contend Kinkade left her the property, along with adjacent art studio.

Casas said Pinto-Walsh's first lawyer had told the estate that he had advised her to vacate the home. However, she didn't, and there are legal reasons why the estate can't evict her at this time, Casas said.

"The whole issue of whether she gets to live there is subject to arbitration," he explained, adding that now there's around-the-clock security at the residence obtained by the estate. He wouldn't say why the beefed up security was needed.

Casas said the residence's mortgage is not at default, but rather triggered a home loan that came due after Kinkade's death who, along with his widow, Nanette Kinkade, are co-borrowers on the approximately $2 million debt remaining on the property.

Casas said there's a provision in the loan agreement that says if a borrower dies, the loan goes into default and it makes the bank accelerate the loan by calling the debt due. "That's all that's happened," he said. "It's the lender's option to enforce that default. There has been no default on mortgage payments and they continue to be paid."

The title to the property is with the Kinkade estate, he said.

A hearing on the probate matter had been set for Aug. 13, but now attorneys for both sides are saying that proceeding will most likely be postponed due to this week's appeal.

Both attorneys estimated it could be about a year before a decision is known on the appeal to the probate matter, with more delays expected after that ruling is issued to determine if there's any kind of trial on the binding arbitration matter related to the agreement and other claims.

About the request for private binding arbitration across the board from the estate, Casas said Kinkade wanted any disputes to be confidential. "He was a guy who thought about his family first. He has a wife, whom he was in divorce proceedings with, and four daughters ... He wanted to protect them ... Thom obviously wanted to protect the family, protect his legacy ... It's almost as if he anticipated that there were going to be disputes with this woman [Pinto-Walsh] and he intentionally wanted to make sure that this was the case and that she understood, agreed to and signed that document herself. There's no surprise here for her, none whatsoever," Casas said.

About Pinto-Walsh's claims that the estate violated a medical directive that gave her access to the disposition of the painter's body, Casas said the allegation is factually and legally without basis.

About the validity of the so-called holographic wills, Casas said: "They kind of speak for themselves ... If it is in his hand, and that's questionable, it's obvious and I believe the timing of those documents ... explain that he wasn't competent at the time. There are different times when he was hospitalized ... his drinking problem. It's the family's decision that even if those were in his hand ... he certainly wasn't in his right mind and that's evidenced by simply looking at them."

Casas said the courts will have to consider that Kinkade was an artist who painted, and "when you look at those kind of chicken-scratch documents you really have to question their authenticity and whether or not he was all there when he may have done that."

Asked how the Thomas Kinkade Company is doing, Casas said it's fine, producing the painter's mass products out of its Morgan Hill location on a daily basis, but he said he didn't know how much sales had increased after his death.

Los Gatos Patch obtained PDF copies of the Kinkade estate's notice of appeal, copies of the wills at question, and Pinto-Walsh's attorneys' order to deny an ex-parte application to enforce arbitration related to the probate matter. Also attached to this story is Pinto-Walsh's declaration supporting opposition to have the probate matters closed.

For comprehensive coverage related to this case, please click here.

Sheila Sanchez July 27, 2012 at 05:48 PM
A gentle reminder to all those who will participate in this conversation about our terms of use. Without limitation, you agree that you will not post or transmit to other users anything that contains content that: • is defamatory, abusive, obscene, profane or offensive; • violates any party’s right of publicity or right of privacy; • is threatening, harassing or that promotes racism, bigotry, hatred or physical harm of any kind against any group or individual; • promotes or encourages violence; • is inaccurate, false or misleading in any way; • is illegal or promotes any illegal activities; • contains “masked” profanity (e.g., F@&#) • contains any advertising, promotional materials, "junk mail," "spam," "chain letters," "pyramid schemes," or any other form of solicitation. Instead of trying to memorize all that, you might boil it down to three main principles: “Keep it clean,” “Don’t try to trick people,” and “Treat others as you’d like to be treated.” Easy, right? We do our best to keep tabs on what is posted on the site, however Patch is under no obligation to screen or monitor content, but may review content from time to time at its sole discretion to determine compliance with the Patch terms of use. Patch will make all determinations as to what content is appropriate at its sole discretion. We may include, edit or remove any content at any time without notice.
SteamGatos August 05, 2012 at 09:18 PM
A lot of Cain gets raised every time an article about the painter of lite gets published here. One must wonder if the dead will be able to stay rested in peace while the "left behind" are in ongoing litigation.
Cathy August 28, 2012 at 01:30 AM
I love the paintings of Thomas Kinkade and what they represent. I would like to send my condolences to his wife and daughters. Nothing can change the legacy of his artwork on the world.
Randy C Spear December 06, 2012 at 05:59 PM
I can't find any news of the results of the Dec.3, 2012 hearing between Nanette Kinkade vs. Amy Pinto Walsh ...so who got what of the tens of millions of dollars? Did Amy pay the $11,000 a month rent ? Personally I think his daughters should get it all. -just sayin'

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »