El Camino Hospital: 'Too Early to Comment on Measure M'

With more than 200,000 mail-in ballots left to be counted, an astonished hospital administration and board will wait for final voter results before considering next steps.

With preliminary election night results showing that Measure M has passed, hospital officials are finding that it's a tough pill to swallow.

"Based on what we currently know, we are disappointed that Measure M passed," said Chris Ernst, spokesperson for El Camino Hospital. "However, at this point it would be too early to comment on the impact or our next steps as the vote has not yet been certified by the Registrar’s office."

While unofficial results show that the measure passed with nearly 52 percent of the vote—24,650 'yes' votes, compared to 22,833 'no' votes—there remain hundreds of thousands of mail-in and provisional ballots to be counted countywide.

According to the Santa Clara County Registrar of Voters spokeswoman Elma Rosas, approximately 200,000 vote-by-mail ballots and roughly 35,000 provisional ballots, still needed to be processed, county-wide. Rosas explained that "processed" meant certified and validated. It was not known what percentage of those ballots were for the hospital district.

However, "the overwhelming majority will be counted," said Rosas. She added that the Registrar has 28 days to certify the votes.

Voters in Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Mountain View, Palo Alto, Cupertino and Sunnyvale were able to cast a vote on Measure M.

According to election contribution filings, . The measure places a cap on executive pay at the hospital to twice that of the governor of California, which is $165,288,  beginning Dec. 3, 2012. The current chief executive of El Camino Hospital earns a base salary of $695,000.

"We will continue to watch the vote as it goes through the certification process," Ernst said. "In the meantime, our hospital’s executive team remains committed and focused on providing quality care to our patients."

Incumbent John Zoglin, re-elected for another term to the hospital's board of directors, expressed dissatisfaction with the current outcome.

"Since we took a formal position against Measure M, I was certainly disappointed it passed," Zoglin said. "As the ballot statement submitted by the Registrar suggested, we do not know if Measure M is legal."

In regard to the new slate of hospital board members he expressed his excitement to work with Julia Miller and Dennis Chiu. But felt "bittersweet" at losing Wesley Alles, who sat on the board for 10 years.

"I am looking forward to working with the executive team and our care givers as they continue to provide award winning quality of care to patients and our community while navigating through the rapidly changing healthcare."

Newly elected candidate Miller shared that it might be difficult for the board to do certain things due to Measure M, but accepted the outcome of the democratic process.

"A lot money was spent to defeat Measure M, but the public has spoken," said Miller. "It doesn't matter what I think."

Miller said she looked forward to serving the public.

"I'm surprised with my win because I was certain Bill James would win and usually the incumbents have an edge," she said. "I'm delighted the public has chosen me to continue my public service."

Patch reached out the SEIU-UHW, the employee union that helped put the measure on the ballot, for comment. They did not respond by time of publication.

Related articles:

  • County Ballot Measures Guide: What Mountain View Voters Need to Know
  • Measure M: Good Economics or Bad Business?
  • Hospital and SEIU-UHW Reach Tentative Contract Agreement
  • Hospital Workers to Hold Candlelight Vigil for Voter Initiative
  • El Camino Hospital Workers Vote to Keep Union
  • El Camino Hospital Workers Want Cap on Exec Pay

Don't miss a thing in Mountain View!

Follow on Twitter |  Like us on Facebook  |  Get the daily newsletter | Post to our calendar | Share an announcement

AR November 08, 2012 at 04:49 AM
i am thrilled that this is turning out badly for all involved. it is just punishment for wasting voters' time with an internal organizational squabble. this was an egregious abuse of the proposition system, made worse by the fact that in the end, the sponsors abandoned it. what next? voting on what color mrs jones will paint her house? should little billy be forced to eat spinach? you decide!
LAH scot November 08, 2012 at 07:07 PM
Legal or not, the message is clear. ECH and its board are out of touch ...and top management is overpaid. ECH needs to re-target itself to become the low-cost provider of quality healthcare services or it should drop its taxpayer-subsidy status and just go private and continue to charge through the roof. Now, the board can decide between wasting more money fighting the views of the majority or get the message and adjust accordingly.
Bill Sheppard November 08, 2012 at 10:54 PM
Sorry, LAH, I disagree - the public is misinformed, or easily swayed by feel-good measures. If ECH truly pays their CEO at the median level for similarly-sized hospitals, what sort of quality leadership do you think we'll get by paying what would surely be in the bottom 10%, and in one of the highest-cost areas of the country to boot? We will all suffer when unskilled management at ECH leads to less efficient operations (equals higher costs), dwindling innovation, and ultimately compromised services.
Bill Sheppard November 08, 2012 at 10:56 PM
Additionally, Prop M is yet another example of our broken proposition process. I hope the board is able to find a remedy in the courts to overturn this petty, malicious, and self-destructive act by the union (of whom I normally am supportive).


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »