Over Presidents’ Day weekend U.S.A. Today obtained a copy of the White House's immigration plan. The plan seems to be very similar to the Senate’s Bipartisan immigration plan. I am a little puzzled over why Senator Marco Rubio (Republican of Florida) who is part of the Senate’s Bipartisan Commission on Immigration called the President’s plan “half-baked and seriously flawed.” He said its approval “would actually make our immigration problems worse.”
It’s possible that he fears that the President is trying to wrest credit from Congress and from the Republicans to cement the immigrant vote. It is possible that the President is trying to provide the Republicans with cover so that they can vote against the President’s plan but still vote for immigration reform. It is also possible that the plan was accidentally leaked to the paper.
The President’s plan provides for the following:
Pathway to Citizenship
- Undocumented immigrants living in the United States could apply for a newly created “Lawful Prospective Immigrant Visa,” which would not be the same as a green-card but would provide them with temporary legal status in the United States;
- People would need to pass a criminal background check, submit biometric information and pay fees to qualify for the new visa. If the visa is approved, they would be allowed to legally reside in the U.S. for four years, legally work in the United States and legally travel outside of the United States for short periods of time. After the four years, they could then apply for an extension of this visa for another four years;
- To qualify for this visa, immigrants would have to pay any back taxes, learn English and pay a penalty of probably a few hundred dollars;
- If the Lawful Prospective Immigrant Visa is approved, then the applicant can apply for the same provisional legal status for their spouse and children living outside of the United States;
- Undocumented immigrants would be ineligible for the program if they were convicted of a crime that led to a prison term of at least one year or three or more different crimes that resulted in a total of 90 days in jail, or if they committed a crime abroad that would make the person inadmissible to or deportable from the United States;
- People currently in removal proceedings would be allowed to apply for this visa, provided they otherwise qualify;
- These immigrants would receive a special identification card to show as proof of their legal status in the United States;
- After eight years or as soon as the immigration back-log is cleared (whichever comes sooner) the immigrants could apply for their green-cards. They would have to prove that they know English as well as the history and government of the United States and they would have to show proof of payment of back taxes; and,
- The plan calls for a reduction of the immigration backlog by getting rid of caps to immigration in certain categories and by temporarily increasing the number of immigrant visas available.
Security and Employment Provisions
- The plan provides for more security funding;
- The plan expands the E-Verify program that checks the immigration status of people seeking new jobs. Businesses with more than 1,000 employees must begin using the system within two years, businesses with more than 250 employees within three years and all businesses within four years. The ACLU has noted that this program will effectively create a federal list of all those in the United States who are eligible to work. If a person is not on the federal list s/he would not be able to work in the United States. This part of the plan could create serious privacy concerns;
- To combat fraud, the President’s plan proposes a new fraud-resistant, tamper resistant, and wear-resistant social security cards;
- Increase in Border Patrol officers;
- Technological improvements along the border; and,
- 140 new immigration judges to reduce the backlogs in immigration cases. The backlog in immigration cases is substantial; for example, right now in San Francisco, the immigration judges are scheduling deportation hearings for 2015.
Paying For The Program
- The plan calls for Customs and Border Protection to study whether a land-border crossing fee should be implemented to help offset border security costs;
- It calls for an increase in inspection fees that border-crossers already pay;
- It allows for the Department of Homeland Security to accept donations from citizens, businesses, local governments, and state governments to improve the ports of entry and security features along the border. Just imagine, The Costco Border Crossing.
The President’s plan differs from the Senate’s bi-partisan plan in that legal status for undocumented immigrants does not hinge upon securing the border, while it does call for increased border security. It is also different in that there is no mention of a guest-worker program to handle future flows of immigrants for agriculture and low-tech jobs.
AFL-CIO/U.S. Chamber of Commerce Plan
While the President and Congress have been working on their immigration plans, the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce have been negotiating plans for changing the immigration system in the United States. Earlier this week, the AFL-CIO and the Chamber of Commerce issued a joint statement setting forth three principles to guide legislation in bringing lesser skilled workers to the United States:
- First, American workers should have the “first crack” at available jobs. Business and labor must improve the way that job listings in lesser-skilled occupations reaches the maximum number of workers, particularly those in disadvantaged communities;
- Second, the plan calls for a worker visa program that responds to the needs of business while fully protecting the wages and working conditions of American workers. The plan calls for a market-driven mechanism that permits businesses to hire foreign workers without having to go through a cumbersome and inefficient process; and,
The AFL-CIO and U.S. Chamber of Commerce joint statement seems to recognize that there is a need in the United States for both high-skilled and low-skilled workers and addresses the need of business for additional workers while protecting the rights and wages, and working conditions of American workers.
Next topic: Immigrants and Welfare
Haha ---------------------------------- Shouldn't that be HarHar
And please don't cite the 14th Amendment as justification for "anchor babies". The intent of that Amendment has been twisted beyond recognition.
Like I said, I wonder if the CHP pulls me over for driving 130mph on the freeway, will he give me a $100 gift card to Target for breaking the law? Here, the illegals are rewarded for breaking the law with citizenship, which is an insult to those who applied to come here legally.
Which make you wonder why ordinary people would have respect for them or any of their laws?
My guess is that when people get comfortable and lazy they have no other ways of communicating theses concerns other than just being rude and ignorant. People please keep in mind that these HARDWOrKING people are the people who pick our fruits and veggies and fruits because that a job that you or I are to proud to do also may I add that there is a shortage of these hardworking individuals right now because people like you complain thY they are taking your jobs . The jobs are there hurry, hurry get them now before you find someone else to complain about. Oh wait people that are lazy don't eat vegetables and fruit , they're to busy stuffing their face with burgers and shit like that not to mention drinking beer and hateraid . FOOLS !!!!! Crumbs !!!!!
America has guest-worker visas for fruit and veggie pickers. But the illegals are invading out nation unlawfully and stealing construction jobs, maintenance jobs, manufacturing jobs, roofing jobs, etc... while committing identity theft and using our resource while contributing little to our tax base. We spend upwards of $20B a year just in California to subsidize free education, free healthcare, free welfare and to operate the justice system to hold them accountable for the crimes they commit. About 30% of the prison beds in California are occupied by illegal migrants. Chinese are hardworking too. Should we saturate our nation with 50M indigent unskilled chinese nationals because they are 'hardworking'??? Naturally you would be 100% opposed to that, wouldn't ya?
It's not about hard working, not hard working, Latino gangster or non gangsters. It's about coming to America legally. How come u don't bring up the fact that these people are law breakers who have broken our laws? Instead, u talk about hard working, which isn't really the conversation here. I know a lot of hard working people who came here LEGALLY. They applied and waited many years before their name was called. Now I say this is the kind of people I want immigrating to America. People who follow our laws. If the folks who come here illegally have no problem breaking our laws, what other laws are they happy to break? Steal someone's ID so they can work? btw- A lot of our fruits and vegetable are now imported from South America so there is less need for produce pickers, but now they stand around Home Depot. Hate? Are u nuts? U will find Americans welcome immigrants if they come here legally. And yes, I much rather pay more for produce than pay for someone who is here illegally using taxpayer funded services.
So many letter writers have based their arguments on how this land is made up of immigrants. Ernie Lujan for one, suggests we should tear down the Statue of Liberty because the people now in question aren't being treated the same as those who passed through Ellis Island and other ports of entry. Maybe we should turn to our history books and point out to people like Mr. Lujan why today's American is not willing to accept this new kind of immigrant any longer.. Back in 1900 when there was a rush from all areas of Europe to come to the United States, people had to get off a ship and stand in a long line in New York and be documented. Some would even get down on their hands and knees and kiss the ground. They made a pledge to uphold the laws and support their new country in good and bad times. They made learning English a primary rule in their new American households and some even changed their names to blend in with their new home.
They had waved good bye to their birth place to give their children a new life and did everything in their power to help their children assimilate into one culture. Nothing was handed to them. No free lunches, no welfare, no labor laws to protect them. All they had were the skills and craftsmanship they had brought with them to trade for a future of prosperity. Most of their children came of age when World War II broke out. My father fought along side men whose parents had come straight over from Germany , Italy , France and Japan . None of these 1st generation Americans ever gave any thought about what country their parents had come from. They were Americans fighting Hitler, Mussolini and the Emperor of Japan . They were defending the United States of America as one people.
When we liberated France , no one in those villages were looking for the French-American or the German American or the Irish American. The people of France saw only Americans. And we carried one flag that represented one country. Not one of those immigrant sons would have thought about picking up another country's flag and waving it to represent who they were. It would have been a disgrace to their parents who had sacrificed so much to be here. These immigrants truly knew what it meant to be an American. They stirred the melting pot into one red, white and blue bowl.
And here we are with a new kind of immigrant who wants the same rights and privileges. Only they want to achieve it by playing with a different set of rules, one that includes the entitlement card and a guarantee of being faithful to their mother country. I'm sorry, that's not what being an American is all about. I believe that the immigrants who landed on Ellis Island in the early 1900's deserve better than that for all the toil, hard work and sacrifice in raising future generations to create a land that has become a beacon for those legally searching for a better life. I think they would be appalled that they are being used as an example by those waving foreign country flags. And for that suggestion about taking down the Statue of Liberty , it happens to mean a lot to the citizens who are voting on the immigration bill. I wouldn't start talking about dismantling the United States just yet. (signed) Rosemary LaBonte In a letter written to an Orange County, CA newspaper
It's not fair that I can't afford a Ferrari, so is it OK for me to steal someone's $ so I can buy one? The proper answer is to work 3 jobs and save for 15 years, so I can buy one. The proper answer when applied to immigration is, apply to come here legally, and wait those years for your name to be called. If u break our laws and sneak over, it's no different than breaking laws to steal $ so u can have that Ferrari now, instead of working for it and buying it 15 years from now.
Stand up and be counted. Stop hiding behind an alias.
And it's Pancho Villa, for Pete's sake. If you'e going to advocate for them, you at least need to spell correctly the names of their heroes. "Poncho" is something we in the Marines used to wear in the rain.
More commonly, Rome bought off their potential enemies with land and promises of citizenship. As recruitment of Romans became progressively more difficult, they offered citizenship as an inducement to "barbarians" to enlist, which is how, by 400 AD or so, the army became overwhelmingly comprised of barbarians.