Hurricane Isaac wasn't the only thing on Republicans’ minds as they congregated in Tampa last week for the Republican National Convention, which crowned Mitt Romney as the party’s candidate for President of the United States last Thursday.
What they should be worried about—very worried—is that their party has turned into a virtual monolith, where other ideas and groups aren’t exactly welcome. They should be worried about ignoring the demographic reality of this country, the importance of minority voters—particularly Hispanics—to their political survival.
They gave speaking slots to a token number of Latino figures, hoping they would serve as ambassadors, but these don’t erase reality. Their party’s platform--and the politicians who defend, promote or stay silent about it—tell the real story: the Republican Party is an island unto itself, sustained entirely on the support of its conservative base, and turning a hostile face toward the largest minority group in the country and the issues that concern us, like immigration. An island that allies itself with some of the leading anti-immigrant figures in the country. Let me give you an example.
Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, the architect of the toughest anti-immigrant laws in the nation (SB 1070 in Arizona and HB 56 in Alabama) and the “brains” of the anti-immigrant movement, is an advisor to the Romney campaign, and the force behind the hard-line immigration position soon to be enshrined in the Republican platform.
And while there’s always a debate over whether party platforms have any real importance, they do reflect a consensus among the party’s leaders—Romney among them—and interest groups about their vision of the issues. In this case, the platform proposes a guest-worker program as a sugar coating for a series of positions that confirm its hostility to immigrants: a border wall, mandatory E-Verify, opposition to “sanctuary cities,” and withdrawing Department of Justice lawsuits against states that have passed anti-immigrant laws, among others.
Republicans continue to answer the central question of immigration policy—what to do with the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the country—as Romney did in the primaries: self-deportation, or, as the platform draft puts it, “humane procedures to encourage illegal aliens to return home voluntarily.”
There’s no mention of the deferred action policy which will allow almost 2 million undocumented youth, known as DREAMers, to obtain temporary protection from deportation and work permits. It doesn’t say—as Romney himself hasn’t said—what will happen to deferred action if Romney is elected president. Will he revoke it? Romney did promise to veto the DREAM Act, which would legalize these young people, and has said that he will offer a “permanent solution” but hasn’t clarified what that solution is.
In the midst of that uncertainty, a development Thursday was revealing: agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and the group NumbersUSA, which advocates a moratorium on all immigration, sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and ICE to stop deferred action from going into effect. And who is the lawyer representing the ICE agents and NumbersUSA? Why, Kris Kobach. As the saying goes, “Dime con quién andas, y te diré quién eres”—tell me who you walk with, and I’ll tell you who you are.
And so Romney and the Republicans come to the event that will mark the starting gun of an obstacle course that ends on Tuesday, Nov. 6 with an obvious “Hispanic problem,” underlined by poll after poll showing Romney’s level of support among Latinos at less than 30 percent--and yet hoping to capitalize on the lack of enthusiasm many Latino voters currently feel.
His, and their, strategy isn’t to propose policies that might attract Latinos, but to erode Obama’s level of Latino support.
I thought elephants were supposed to have excellent memories.
This case appears to be the exception, because the elephants meeting in Tampa forgot and discarded, in their prejudice, the gains made by figures like George W. Bush who understood the importance of the Latino vote to their future as a party. And among those who have rejected that legacy include, regrettably, Republican Hispanic leaders who once stood shoulder to shoulder with Bush and now find themselves robotically defending a candidate who’s perpetuated Republicans’ anti-immigrant, anti-Hispanic image.
Last week, Tampa hosted a convention for the forgetful elephants.
Maribel Hastings is a senior adviser to America’s Voice.
2) Illegal immigration and Latino voters are two different political issues, we really need to separate these and stop talking as if every Latino supports breaking the law, letting people slip through the cracks, cutting corners, etc. Why would someone want their neighbors to get a free pass when they put in all the work to get here legally? I know not everyone thinks that way, but I resist the notion that these two issues are tied hand in hand. Supporting a border wall or being anti-sanctuary city is not anti-Latino or anti-immigration, it's anti-illegal immigration. That is an issue we should be concerned with as a nation - regardless of where the folks are coming from. I feel as if this line has purposely been blurred for political reasons over the past decade or so to pit various groups against each other - divide and conquer as they say. Suddenly if one wants stricter border enforcement they are "anti-Latino", and they are "anti-Latino", that must then make them "racist". These notions are ridiculous.
This is an interesting artilce from 2010. If you believe this author both parties are driving away Latino voters: http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-06-09-column09_ST_N.htm
You make a good point about separating the issues of immigration policy and the Latino-American voter preferences. I think people forget that people from a lot of different countries want to live in ours. A factor that contributes to this problem is that people default to their visual senses to determine who belongs here and who doesn't.
Randy has left the building
Why? Because the Democrat Party - aka "The Party of The Government Workers Union" - keeps offering certain groups one more piece of candy that they don't really deserve. They're selling certain Voters something for nothing - the classic sucker bet. They caused this Great Depression themselves just to buy your Vote. Over decades - town by town - empowered by their fixed court decisions. The resulting morbidly obese ever expanding government has sucked our economy dry - just to create their ever growing cast of self satisfied, incredibly spoiled, overpaid, arrogant goosestepping fascist government employees. Then, they've shown the gall to describe their brown-shirted mob of unproductive dead weight as: "The Middle Class" - even as they are strangling the actual American Middle Class. No? Do the people of Watsonville really benefit more from the Democrats' FIFTY TWO MILLION DOLLAR city hall "Sadam Palace" than they would benefit from being allowed to Elect their own strong Mayor?
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Boy, I'd like you to cite your source on that one. Having a strong middle class creates more wealth for everyone. Smaller government is a clever code for more layoffs, it’s a way to sell the public on the eventual elimination of programs they overwhelmingly support, like Social Security and Medicare. No capitalist economy can grow without demand for goods and services. Demand is not created by shrinking income through budget cuts and government worker layoffs, or the elimination of healthcare and pension checks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please clarify what you mean by this statement.
If only for the simple reason that private enterprise requires careful attention to making a profit by getting a real product out the door. Because, the presence of “real product” in the marketplace not only directly employs those who manufacture it, it generates spinoff profit – more jobs, more prosperity – for many others as it vends its way through society. “What a bunch of worthless drivel, please try again using facts instead of a rant that leads to nowhere.” Please be more specific.