Netflix's Future Campus Still in Limbo
Town Council tells developer to return Aug. 1 to further revise plan for Los Gatos Business Park.
The developer of the Los Gatos Business Park, the location that Netflix could possibly expand into, presented a largely scaled back project Monday evening to the Town Council.
However, the Council asked John R. Shenk to return Aug. 1 with further revisions to his latest plan that calls for 168 multi-family or senior units, 70 percent less than the original 500-plus proposed and an agreement to not pull a building permit for any residential units until 2016.
The project's residential component would be an addendum to its main part, two high-rise office buildings for Netflix that would be erected at the park located at 90-160 Albright Way and 14600 Los Gatos Blvd. The land is owned by Mike White with Huettig & Schromm Inc., who wants town officials to approve a 20-year development agreement giving him certain rights to the land.
On Monday evening, Shenk proposed a wedding-cake approach to the buildings, meaning taller structures would be built further away from the front to lessen impact.
Los Gatos Town Manager Greg Larson strongly urged the council to rezone the land to make way for the year-old project as a so-called "Class A" high-tech campus for the town.
Larson and Wendie Rooney, Los Gatos Community Development director, explained the town needs to increase such types of buildings, considered to be the highest quality and with the best locations and tenants in municipalities.
Shenk had also agreed to limit housing built on the property to no more than seven of the 21 acres contained in the park as well as to increase the minimum amount of new office/research and development space from 200,000 square feet to 250,000 square feet.
Netflix Chief Financial Officer David Wells encouraged the Council to approve the project on the merits of the use of the land and not on the merits of Netflix.
More than 40 speakers addressed the Council Monday evening, both in favor and against the project, some insinuating that Netflix was holding the town hostage with the threat of a possible move out of town if Shenk is not allowed to proceed as desired.
Kevin P. Dincher and Charles P. Born, who own a home at 105 Stratmore Place, wrote a letter opposing the previous height proposed for the buildings.
"Will Netflix and the developer exploit that fear to grow in a way that depreciates our property values and quality of life—rather than be good corporate citizens who work to meet their growth needs in a way that supports the value and quality of out town and neighborhood?" they said in their missive.
Other residents expressed concern about traffic and school impacts, fearing that if residential units are built it would overwhelm already-full schools in the 3,000-plus student Los Gatos Union School District.
The company is the town's highest sales tax contributor, generating more than $3 million a year in such revenue.
After more than three hours of mulling the issue, the Council voted to hear the proposal again on Aug. 1.
Prior to postponing a vote on the matter, Councilwoman Barbara Spector, backed by Councilman Steven Leonardis, proposed to allow up to 550,000 square feet of office/research and development on the property, excluding housing.
That motion, however, failed by a 3-5 vote, with Los Gatos Mayor Joe Pirzynski, Vice Mayor Steve Rice and Councilwoman Diane McNutt voting against.
After Spector's motion was seconded, Shenk told the Council that eliminating housing from the plan "is not something we can work with," and suggested a "continuance" on the matter to "bridge some gaps."
Spector and Leonardis' motion also called for limiting building heights to 55 feet or three stories.
However, Councilwoman Diane McNutt asked for the motion to be withdrawn to study other options that could include building housing for seniors. Such dwelling units are in short supply in town, she said.
"This is too important to rush to make a decision," McNutt said, in making a motion to continue the matter. Her motion passed by a 4-1 vote with Vice Mayor Steve Rice casting the dissenting vote.
Rice compared the issue to "sausage being made ... you don't want to be there."
Mayor Joe Pirzynski said he was disappointed at the issue's continuance since he thought the Council could have moved forward with the project Monday evening. "I'm looking for a large degree of ... trust ... that says we don't have to always be suspicious of the motivations of those people who are making recommendations to develop in our community."
Ed Dee
7:45 am on Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Very disappointed the council could not find a way to agree last night. Not sure why Mrs. Spector's motion did not include some compromise on the housing aspect. This matter has been been well documented and discussed, with minimal/no impact to schools & traffic if the senior living proposal is pursued.
I am embarrassed by some of my neighbors who actually believe increasing quality commerce and living options within our town would actually hurt property values. Empty store fronts do more to hurt our property values than just about any other factor.
bc
10:55 am on Tuesday, June 21, 2011
imo opinion you're both right. i concur with ed that residents are being incredibly misguided in opposition, and likely are completely oblivious as to the services at risk should this, perhaps our only tier-1 corporate resident, move.
vikki is also right that many of the changes to retail are structural and macroeconomic. i'm actually shocked that so many of the merchants can still prosper against online retailers that can deliver to my doorstep in 24 hours at a discounted price to what i can get down the street. and this is also why you will never see another big book store in town again, it would be suicide to invest in that dead business.
the town is going to grow one way or another, and more schools will have to be built. maintaining school quality is going to require investment. it is myopic to presume the population of the town can be frozen
Brad Hayden
2:49 am on Thursday, June 23, 2011
Here's how I see it. We're in the middle of the worst economic down turn since the depression. Governments are laying off workers and cutting services because of budget shortfalls, and a major corporation wants to build its new headquarters in your town bringing in much needed revenue, and the City Council/Planning Commission is giving them grief because their plan is too big? If you need another school to support the new housing, make Netflicks build it but let them have their five stories. While I can understand the desire to keep your town's small town feel, Your town won't stay small forever and you need to be thinking ahead so that next time, you still have tax revenue coming in when the retail shops falter. And I still believe they should build underground.
Ed Dee
7:46 am on Thursday, June 23, 2011
Well said, Brad.
Andy Crowe
5:21 pm on Friday, June 24, 2011
The real deal came out in the meeting. Netflix is only willing to commit to 200k to 250k square feet, but they require an option to build out to 550k sq ft. The option expires in 2016. Until 2016, Mr. Shenk's hands are tied, but after that he wants to be able to build out residential, either senior or multi-family. He "generously" offered to reduce his number of residential units to 168 units on 7 acres, but it's really just a reflection of the deal that he is working with Netflix. I think that the underlying question is whether it is appropriate to convert one of the few areas zoned for commercial to more residential in the town. The town staff noted that we should maximize the value of our commercial zoned areas which are so "precious" and allow Netflix to build a Class A office campus on the parcel. What I find baffling is that the town follows that statement with a recommendation to allow the developer to convert the property to residential. The net result of the proposed deal is that the developer will only invest in new commercial structures as dictated by Netflix until 2016, and then develop the rest as residential. Is that the outcome that we want? Is the town better off if the developer has an incentive to build out the Class A commercial property from the beginning, rather than wait to see if the residential trigger will come? I think so. That is why I don't think the zoning change to residential helps the town.